The Lower Haight is known for restaurants sans pretension. Kate's takes this mission seriously, with a down-home feel and friendly staff. Like our party, you will probably be charmed initially by a reproduction map of the United States that dominates most of the left wall. It looks to be WPA-era, and illustrates various states with drawings of notable culture or principal crop. Much of California is heavily covered by forest. But draw your eyes south and you come upon the lovely heritage of racial caricature: the deep Southern states are represented by typical Happy Darkie imagery: two black folk, one dancing and one playing an instrument; a chunk of Georgia is identified solely by puffs of cotton. Canadians will be mildly unhappy with their depiction as a mountie-dominated wilderness, but that's not much compared to the blatant minstrelsy in Alabama and Mississipi. There are a couple of reasons that the owners of this place would choose to ignore some of the iconography in their main piece of art: "It's from a long time ago!" To which I reply, not all art from a long time ago is racist, and you are not an art museum. You have no requirement to hang stuff regardless of its objectionable content. Another is that they simply didn't notice or acknowledge the racism, despite the fact that Indians aren't treated that well in the piece either. Or they hoped that patrons would think the thing was kitschy and cute (which parts of it are) and not think too seriously about what it actually depicts. Or they're black and it didn't bother them so why should it bother anyone else? But even if no one has ever complained since they don't want to be accused of being too sensitive/obsessed by race/whatever the silencing criticism is today, it's still a questionable choice to deliberately reproduce something that contains pernicious racial imagery.
But what about the food, FL? I am always cautious in writing about a place at which I don't try the house specialties, which at Kate's are the hush puppies and the French toast. But I couldn't pass up another place in town, the third by my count, which serves veggie biscuits and gravy. Learn of my surprise when what arrived at first sniff seemed to be cream of mushroom soup. Although the prevailing mood has been to replace the sausage in the gravy with parsley and green onion, Kate's has chosen instead to replace them with mushrooms. The gravy doesn't have the consistency of mushroom soup, thank god, but it was fairly thick and seemed better suited to something served at dinner. The biscuits were larger than normal and provided a good value for the dollar, but undistinguished. Also, unlike most other places in the Western world, Kate's doesn't provide a B&G special that includes sides, so you are pretty well stuck unless you share some of your fellows' food. I got to do that because my mother was unimpressed with her breakfast sandwich. It's not their fault that she doesn't like Kaiser rolls, but she also found it bland. I thought it was decent plain fare and meat eaters would probably enjoy it with the house-made sausage. Home fries had big pieces of potato but again could be described as 'just sort of there.' My father loved his omelette, and we all thought well of the service.
Bottom line: if I lived in the neighborhood, Kate's would be a good place to have an everyday, reasonably-priced breakfast. As far as I can tell it's not a destination meal.